Liability of the CEO of a company in Tajikistan

Liability of the CEO of a company in Tajikistan

1) Can a CEO of a private company be personally liable for the acts/omission and / or obligations of the company?

As a general rule, a CEO does not bear personal liability for the company’s obligations, since a legal entity is liable for its obligations independently and with all of its own property.

However, the CEO may incur personal liability towards the company for damages caused by his or her fault (action or omission), and in certain circumstances may also face subsidiary liability, if it is proven that his or her conduct led to insolvency or involved abuse of authority.

2) In which cases may a CEO incur civil liability in connection with performance or a failure to perform his duties?

A CEO (as the sole executive body of the company) may incur civil liability if it is established that his or her actions or omissions in the performance of duties caused losses to the company and were committed with fault (i.e., in violation of the law, the charter, or the principles of good faith and reasonableness).

Such liability may arise, in particular, in cases of:

  • exceeding or abusing authority;
  • entering into transactions in breach of mandatory corporate approval procedures;
  • causing damage as a result of unreasonable or bad-faith management decisions;
  • contributing to the company’s insolvency (which may trigger subsidiary liability).

In such circumstances, the CEO may be required to compensate the company for the losses incurred in full.

3) What violations may trigger administrative liability of a CEO as a company official?

A CEO may incur administrative liability as an official if an administrative offence is committed in connection with the non-performance or improper performance of his or her official duties.

In practice, this may arise, for example, in cases of violations of:

  • tax legislation;
  • labour and occupational safety laws;
  • licensing requirements;
  • competition (antimonopoly) legislation;
  • accounting rules;, and
  • other applicable regulations.

4) Under what circumstances may a CEO face criminal liability?

A CEO may incur criminal liability if his or her actions or omissions constitute a criminal offence under the Criminal Code of the Republic of Tajikistan. This may include, in particular, abuse or excess of official powers, intentional or fictitious bankruptcy, as well as economic crimes (such as fraud, misappropriation, embezzlement, etc.), provided that such acts have caused significant damage or other serious consequences. 

5) Can a CEO be held liable for the actions of subordinates, in particular, if he delegates a part of his authorities?

Yes, a CEO may bear liability for the actions of subordinates if such actions occurred due to inadequate supervision, improper organization of work, or unlawful delegation of authority.  Delegation itself does not automatically release the CEO from liability where he or she was required to ensure proper oversight and compliance with applicable law.

At the same time, the CEO’s liability depends on the existence of fault (intent or negligence), as well as whether the relevant functions fell within his or her managerial duties and whether reasonable measures were taken to supervise and prevent violations.

6) Does the business judgment rule apply to a CEO?

Tajik legislation does not expressly provide for the business judgment rule (i.e., the presumption of good faith and reasonableness of managerial business decisions).

However, similar principles are reflected in the law:

  • The CEO (director, general director) is required to act in good faith and reasonably in the interests of the company and its shareholders;
  • When determining liability, the usual conditions of commercial practice and other relevant circumstances of the case are taken into account;
  • If the manager’s actions were consistent with ordinary business practice and were not manifestly harmful, liability may not arise.

7) Can a CEO be held liable for his actions or omission after termination of their office?

Yes, a CEO (director, general director) may be held liable for actions or omissions committed during the period of exercising his/her powers, even after such powers have been terminated.

  • Civil liability: if losses or damage were caused to the company or third parties during the performance of duties, the former CEO may be held liable upon a claim brought by the company or its participants/shareholders.
  • Criminal liability: if a criminal offence was committed (for example, abuse of authority or fraud), the former CEO may be prosecuted regardless of whether he/she still holds the position.
  • Administrative liability: if a violation is discovered after termination of powers but within the applicable limitation period, the former CEO may also be held administratively liable.

8) Can a CEO’s liability be limited by an employment contract, articles of association or internal corporate documents?

The liability of the CEO (director, general director) may be limited by the employment contract, the charter, or internal corporate documents only to the extent that such limitations do not contradict applicable law.

  • Civil liability for damages caused by culpable actions or omissions cannot be fully excluded or limited by internal corporate documents unless otherwise expressly provided by law.
  • Criminal and administrative liability cannot be limited by any corporate documents — such liability arises strictly under statutory law.
  • The employment contract or charter may provide for additional guarantees, indemnification mechanisms, or dispute resolution procedures, but not for a complete exemption from liability.

9) Is a CEO liable for failure to comply with the tax, accounting and other reporting requirements?

Yes. The CEO, as the sole executive body of the company, is responsible for organizing proper accounting and ensuring the timely submission of tax, financial, and other mandatory reports.

Failure to submit reports or submission of inaccurate information may result in administrative liability for the CEO as an official. Where the elements of a criminal offense are present (for example, large-scale tax evasion), criminal liability may also arise.

At the same time, the legal entity itself may also be held liable; however, this does not release the CEO from personal liability where fault is established.

10) What practical steps can a CEO take to mitigate the risks of his criminal, administrative and civil liability?

Practical measures to mitigate CEO liability risks:

1. Comply with applicable laws, the charter, internal regulations, and act in good faith and reasonably.
2. Establish and maintain an effective internal control and audit system.
3. Delegate authority only to competent employees and properly supervise their performance.
4. Maintain and retain all required documentation (accounting, tax, HR, etc.) in full and submit reports in a timely manner.
5. Timely inform shareholders/participants about material risks and significant decisions.
6. Make decisions based on reliable information and document them through formal resolutions or minutes.
7. When necessary, consult with legal and audit professionals.
8. Obtain directors’ and officers’ (D&O) liability insurance.
9. Avoid conflicts of interest and abuse of authority.
10. In case of insolvency risk, initiate the required legal procedures in a timely manner.

Author: Kamoliddin Mukhamedov

Tajikistan
Corporate and M&A