The unified procedure of implementing public-private partnership projects has been approved in Uzbekistan
According to the Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers “On Improvement of the Procedure of Implementation of Public-Private Partnership Projects” No.259 dated April 24, 2020 (the “Resolution No.259”), the mechanism of forming and approving prices for products under public-private partnership projects (the “PPP”) has been determined.
On April 30, 2020, there was adopted the Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers of the Republic of Uzbekistan “On Amending the Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers dated August 2, 2005, No.180 “On measures to implement the Decree of the President of the Republic of Uzbekistan “On additional measures to stimulate the attraction of direct private foreign investment” No.264 (the “Resolution No.264”).
Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, quarantine regime continues in Uzbekistan. However, at the moment, the country is gradually weakening some of the quarantine measures.
A new procedure for monitoring of foreign trade operations is approved in Uzbekistan
In order to optimize the monitoring of foreign trade operations in the Republic of Uzbekistan, as well as to simplify the procedure for recording information on foreign trade contracts and invoices in a Unified electronic information system of foreign trade operations (the "UEISFTO"), the Resolution of the Cabinet of Ministers “On measures to further improve the monitoring of foreign trade operations in the Republic of Uzbekistan” No.283 dated May 14, 2020 approved the Regulation “On the procedure for monitoring and control of foreign trade operations” (the “Regulation”).
On May 14, 2020 GRATA International held a webinar on: “Staff. Anti-crisis measures. Changes in Labor Legislation” in the framework of action – HR-SUPPORT
Marina Kolesnikova, Counsel of GRATA International, spoke on and shared her experience in the webinar.
The Supreme court of the Russian Federation explained: if there is no contract, this does not mean that it is impossible to collect the debt
Organization-1 performed for the Organization-2 services for the repair of the roof of the building without a contract, and then sent to the address of the Organization-2 the relevant act of acceptance of work performed, certificate of cost of works and costs. However, Organization-2 refused to sign these documents, because, in its view, the disputed work was performed pursuant to a subcontract entered into between Organization-1 and the third party, and repairs is warranty.